Monday, August 6, 2012

Corresponding to Him

Did God create men to be superior to women? Many people think so; and they quote the Bible to prove it. I'm not so sure! This sermon examines Genesis 2:18-25 to see if there is any support for the idea that men are superior to women. What do you think?



It is said that when God decided to create woman, God first consulted with the man. “If you give me an arm and a leg,” God offered, “I’ll create a companion for you who will cook your meals, clean your home, and run all your errands.” The man considered; and then replied, “I don’t know. An arm and a leg is a lot to lose. What will you create if I only give you a rib?” And the rest... is history!

The relationship between men and women: We cry about it, we fret about it, and we certainly joke about it. The great philosopher Socrates is reported to have said, “My advice to you, young man, is to get married. If you find a good wife, you’ll be happy. If not, you’ll become a philosopher.” More recently, the humorist Will Rogers commented, “There’s two theories about arguin’ with a woman; and neither one works.” Even the science-fiction writer Ray Bradbury put in his two cents’ when he said, “Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea.”

But when all the jokes have been told and all the clever lines have been said, we’re left with a serious question: What should the relationship of men and women be? Many people have claimed that one is superior to the other. The early Christian thinker Augustine concluded that women are fit only to bear children. The medieval theologian Thomas Aquinas stated that women are defective, while men are complete. And the reformer John Knox stated flatly, “Woman was made for only one reason: to serve and obey man.”

Is that right? Are men superior to women? That is what some Christian denominations teach; and they claim that the Bible supports it. They use texts from both Old and New Testament to prove their point; but the story on which all of their thinking rests is the story of the creation of man and woman in Genesis 2. So maybe we’d better take another look at that story. What does it really say about the relationship between men and women? How does God intend for them to relate?

Some people find meaning in the order in which humans were created. They say that man is superior to woman because man was created first. But that argument doesn’t really hold up when we look at it closely. If you’re going to argue that whatever is created first is better, then what do we do with the story in Genesis 1? Remember that in Genesis 1, men and women were created last. Is that story saying that everything else in creation is better than human beings? Of course not! Genesis 1 says that human beings are created in God’s image, meant to rule on earth in God’s place. In Genesis 1, the best thing in creation – humankind – is created last. The relationship between men and women can’t rest on which one was created first.

But if we look closely at the Hebrew words that are used in Genesis 2, we can find a really big clue as to what God intended the relationship of men and women to be. We find it in how God refers to the woman before she is even created. In verse 18, God decides to find an ”ezer k’negdo” for the newly created human. That’s the Hebrew for what God is looking for: an “ezer k’negdo.” What does that mean? Well, the first word, “ezer,” can be translated as “helper.” But that word “ezer” doesn’t refer to a servant! An “ezer” is someone who is strong: a nurturer and a protector. In fact, the word “ezer” in the Old Testament is most often used to describe God! When Psalm 121 confesses that our “help” comes from the Lord, the One who makes heaven and earth, the word for “help” is “ezer.” No one in their right mind would describe God as the maid! An “ezer” is the help on whom you can always rely.

So if “ezer” means a strong, reliable help, what about the Hebrew word “k’negdo”? Like many Hebrew words, it’s hard to translate. The closest that we can come is that it means “corresponding to him.” The New International Version says “suitable for him,” while the New Revised Standard Version translates it “as his partner.” It’s really a question of status. Someone in the Ancient Near East who was “k’negdo” had the same social standing that you had. “K’negdo” is neither above you nor beneath you. If you put the two words together – “ezer k’negdo” – it describes a social equal who is a source of nurturing strength. If we trust the words that the author of Genesis used, that’s what God intends women to be – partners who are not only the social equals of men; but who also nurture them, protect them, and are a source of their strength.

Of course, we all know that in the Genesis story, this ideal relationship hardly gets off the ground before it is spoiled. When the first two humans eat the fruit of the forbidden tree in the middle of the garden, their equal relationship turns into something very different. We’ll consider that story in a couple of weeks. For now, it’s enough to say that although women are subservient to men, that situation is not what God originally intended.

But in Christ, that relationship is mended. Jesus accepted all people – both men and women – as God’s valued children. He modeled God’s original intent for men and women. In the eyes of Jesus, neither was less valuable than the other. Paul understood this, and reminds us in his letter to the Galatians, “There is no longer Jew nor Greek, there is no longer slave nor free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus.” Through Christ, the relationship of mutuality that men and women can and should have is restored. We may not be back in the Garden of Eden; but we can live as though we are!

Unfortunately, living like that is hard to do. There are areas of the world in which men are legally in charge, and women have virtually no status. Saudi Arabia comes to mind. Women aren’t even permitted to drive a car in Saudi Arabia! Girls are forced into marriages that benefit their fathers financially; and showing any independence might lead to their being stoned to death. Our own culture even buys into the inequality. For years we have heard that women aren’t as valuable as men. And girls are caught in a cultural bind. On the one hand, the media portrays them as shallow, stupid, or scheming. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, just watch one episode of The Real Housewives of Orange County. On the other hand, Madison Avenue holds women to impossibly high standards. Have you ever seen an aging, overweight woman – somebody who looks like me – in a clothing advertisement? I didn’t think so. It’s no wonder that little girls grow up not knowing who they are!

Hopefully it’s here, in the midst of the body of Christ, that women can see what God intended for them. It’s here that men and women can live in mutually supportive relationships that nurture both of them. It’s here that men can put down the heavy burden of always needing to be in charge, and let someone else carry their heavy loads for a while. It’s here that girls can learn that they are valuable children of God just as much as boys! Hopefully here, in our congregation, both men and women can learn how God intended them to relate to one another, even as they learn how God wants them to relate to Jesus Christ.

Yes, the relationship between men and women is a complicated, controversial topic. That isn’t likely to change any time soon. And each one of us has to work out for ourselves who we are, and how we relate to one another as women and as men. Maybe the best way for me to end this sermon is the way I began it – with a quote. It’s by Ralph Waldo Emerson, American essayist and poet. He said, “Let us treat both men and women well. Treat them as if they were real. Perhaps they are.”

No comments:

Post a Comment